I think you’re right to point out the inertia in the labor market and the structural energy required for paradigm shifts. What worries me most, though, is that

I think you’re right to point out the inertia in the labor market and the structural energy required for paradigm shifts. What worries me most, though, is that because of exactly the reasons you’ve described — and now, with the rise of GenAI that makes generating boilerplate imperative code even easier — we might be permanently missing the opportunity to invent a better, more elegant solution. Instead of challenging the underlying paradigm, we’re accelerating its replication — just with fewer keystrokes. GenAI is helping us pave cow paths, not design highways. My fear is that the convenience of generating "good enough" code at scale will solidify suboptimal workflows, and the space for reimagining them might quietly close forever.