5 ms·
I don't know what Sabine would spend $40B on instead, but intuitively that seems like it could buy a lot of research in a lot of areas, rather than picking part
by Jabbles 1y ago
I don't know what Sabine would spend $40B on instead, but intuitively that seems like it could buy a lot of research in a lot of areas, rather than picking particle physics.
And it doesn't have to be physics, it could be cancer research, or not even research: each country involved could upgrade their sewage system instead.
But Sabine doesn't have to have all the answers to be right to point out that there's an enormous conflict of interest if you ask particle physicists whether they'd like $40B. Of course they'll say yes.
- SiempreViernes 1y ago> there's an enormous conflict of interest if you ask particle physicists whether they'd like $40B That's not a conflict of interest, like at all. What are you talking about?
- pests 1y agoI think they are confusing "conflict of interest" and just "in their interest". If you asked me if my friend Bob should get a free $100 or if I should get a free $100; of course I'm going to choose myself, as that's in my best interest. There is no conflict though. I believe the core point being "of course particle physicists want more funding of particle physics"