6 ms·
At no point did submeta qualify their statement to only apply to former soldiers. Quite the rather - they removed the nuance that did exist in their quoted prop
by steventhedev 1y ago
At no point did submeta qualify their statement to only apply to former soldiers. Quite the rather - they removed the nuance that did exist in their quoted propaganda articles and made it explicitly based on national origin only.
- kombine 1y agoNo, submeta specifically talked about people with "strong ties to Russia" and "strong ties to Israel". This needs clarification, but in the context of the article this clearly means to the country's governments or military, not any random national. > their quoted propaganda articles Their comment is now flagged, but from memory the articles they linked were factual. You can label them propaganda all you want, this does not change the truth.