5 ms·
It's much heavier but a lot more powerful and flexible.
by go_prodev 1y ago
It's much heavier but a lot more powerful and flexible.
- XCSme 1y agoThanks! And is it more or less performant on large datasets (100k+ data points).
- etimberg 1y agomaintainer of chartjs here. It’s probably more performant. Chart.js isn’t designed for a ton of data and we recommend sampling before visualization . We have a builtin plugin that does a form of min/max sampling to retain peaks but cut down on the amount of data points drawn
- rudasn 1y agoHey! Thanks for maintaining chartjs :)
- leeoniya 1y agomaintainer of uPlot here :) they're about same for line chart rendering when using decimation in both.
- XCSme 1y agoWow, that's cool, thanks for working on it, I've been using Chart.js for many years :) Performance seemed quite good with Chart.js in my case, for small to medium datasets.