6 ms·
In a similar vein, there is Wikisource.[0] Wikisource has the advantage of allowing for extensive formatting to closely match the source works due to its wiki-b
by Arcorann 1y ago
In a similar vein, there is Wikisource.[0] Wikisource has the advantage of allowing for extensive formatting to closely match the source works due to its wiki-based format, but doesn't have quite as robust processes. Its flexibility is unparalleled though -- it covers virtually any form of scanned print work and even some old movies, and contributors can focus on whatever niches they're interested in if they want.
[0] https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Main_Page https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Main_Page
- grues-dinner 1y ago> doesn't have quite as robust processes They do have a double-pass system for all works based on scanned pages, which is quite nifty. Green means two passes complete: https://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/Index:Sophocles%27_King_Oedipus.pdf https://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/Index:Sophocles%27_King_Oed... Plus you can just jump in to any work, in true wiki fashion.