7 ms·

they sits on that legacy IP as if anybody cared, i was in the hobbyist program and they screwed it. I was able to download and setup all their products, and now

they sits on that legacy IP as if anybody cared, i was in the hobbyist program and they screwed it. I was able to download and setup all their products, and now i cant do even that, the only option is to re-download and re-setup an VM image every 6 month or so. really "user friendly". and then they're wining that nobody contributes to the opensource for VMS.

progmetaldev 1y ago
Sounds like a company that has enough high paying legacy clients that they still offer a bit of support, but want that free open source work without improving it to make that work easier to complete.
- BSDobelix 1y ago
  https://vmssoftware.com/about/news/2024-03-25-community-license-update/ https://vmssoftware.com/about/news/2024-03-25-community-lice... >Despite our initial aspirations for robust community engagement, the reality has fallen short of our expectations. The level of participation in activities such as contributing open-source software, creating wiki articles, and providing assistance on forums has not matched the scale of the program. The "aspiration" lasted for a whole year ;)
deleted 1y ago
[deleted]
BSDobelix 1y ago
>really "user friendly". and then they're wining that nobody contributes to the opensource for VMS. Yep, one of the first versions of the x86 version one could download everything and it was planed to renew the license once a year. They then canceled the the license after only one year to provide a new image every year (as if i want to reconfigure my system every year). That's not how you attract dev's or users.
4ad 1y ago
At some point I was contacted to do a VMS port of Go, for the new x86 port (I have written the Go ports for arm64, sparc64, and for Solaris). In the end it all fizzled out because they couldn't arrange for some sort of license for me such that I would actually be able to run VMS.

progmetaldev 1y ago

Sounds like a company that has enough high paying legacy clients that they still offer a bit of support, but want that free open source work without improving it to make that work easier to complete.

BSDobelix 1y ago
https://vmssoftware.com/about/news/2024-03-25-community-license-update/ https://vmssoftware.com/about/news/2024-03-25-community-lice... >Despite our initial aspirations for robust community engagement, the reality has fallen short of our expectations. The level of participation in activities such as contributing open-source software, creating wiki articles, and providing assistance on forums has not matched the scale of the program. The "aspiration" lasted for a whole year ;)

deleted 1y ago

[deleted]

BSDobelix 1y ago

>really "user friendly". and then they're wining that nobody contributes to the opensource for VMS. Yep, one of the first versions of the x86 version one could download everything and it was planed to renew the license once a year. They then canceled the the license after only one year to provide a new image every year (as if i want to reconfigure my system every year). That's not how you attract dev's or users.

4ad 1y ago

At some point I was contacted to do a VMS port of Go, for the new x86 port (I have written the Go ports for arm64, sparc64, and for Solaris). In the end it all fizzled out because they couldn't arrange for some sort of license for me such that I would actually be able to run VMS.