6 ms·
Shouldn't be paying for bandwidth.
by explain 1y ago
Shouldn't be paying for bandwidth.
- thunderfork 1y agoNo such thing as a free lunch - whatever balance sheet it lands on, every byte of every request costs someone something.
- stefan_ 1y agoNo, the link exists, every second you saturate it or not, and if not it's just lost bytes.
- urda 1y agoThat's not how bandwidth metering works at all.
- sitkack 1y agoYeah, because they use Google Cloud. /s If you think Wikipedia is delivering over a metered link, turn in your nerd card at the front desk.
- urda 1y agoI just about gave myself whiplash reading that, your critical thinking is all over the place and completely disconnected with reality. You poorly assumed bandwidth is free (like many people do it is a common mistake), which tells me everything I need to know. Take your own advice: hand in your nerd card at the front desk, and don’t even think about passing go or collecting 200.
- Affric 1y agoYep but Wikipedia exists to freely disseminate information to humans. Should they pay for the bandwidth for AI agents?
- sitkack 1y agoHow to tell people you don’t know how carrier grade internet connections work.
- tatersolid 1y agoEvery request contributes to server costs. Every byte contributes to the 95/5 pricing. Wikipedia can’t afford private peering with every ISP in the world.
- explain 1y agoBandwidth is dirt cheap. I do 30 petabytes per month.
- nullpoint420 1y agoI assume it’s for work, but man am I jealous. Cox Internet has me on a 1TB/mo cap.