5 ms·
A company of about 400 total on-site staff, about 8ish internal IT staff before, and 3 internal IT staff after. FOAD, Hope that Helps, Have a Nice Day.
by fallenpegasus 14y ago
A company of about 400 total on-site staff, about 8ish internal IT staff before, and 3 internal IT staff after.
FOAD, Hope that Helps, Have a Nice Day.
- zcvosdfdgj 14y agothank you.. that tells me far more about the situation
- emeraldd 14y ago8ish is significantly less than I was expecting. My hat's off to them for keeping things running so smoothly!
- keithpeter 14y ago8 to 400 just keeping a system going (assumed MS from the vocabulary in the original article) sounds like a reasonable metric to me assuming no big business application development. 3 to 400 sounds very small, especially if there needs to be a Windows roll out (e.g. xp -> 7). Disclaimer: I'm an observant end user who has worked in organisations ranging from 70 to 1200 staff total, and who has seen huge differences in basic it function. As others have pointed out, the cost of the less efficient IT support is 'hidden' in other budgets and in people 'just getting on with it'. I've seen newly appointed people share logins with established people just to be able to do anything which is an obvious security problem. My current employers have noticeably good IT support, but need to make savings, so I am worried.
- bdunbar 14y agoEven if they'd kept 3 of the best and brightest they'd be hard pressed to keep up.