6 ms·

What do you think constitutes a collapse? Can you give a modern times example of a country collapsing in a way you’re imagining the US might?

• BrenBarn 2y ago
  Not exactly a country, but Hong Kong comes to mind. . .
  • csomar 2y ago
    Hong Kong did not collapse. eh, it is doing okay. Sure you have a reduction in liberties but that's not what collapse means.
    • Retric 2y ago
      The people who lived in Hong Kong are worse off today even outside of political freedoms.
      • HPsquared 2y ago
        It's more "regression" or something. "Collapse" implies a dramatic event and something completely broken.
        • Retric 2y ago
          The collapse of the Roman Empire took decades and British Empire had a similarly long decline, but I understand your sentiment.
          • HPsquared 2y ago
            Yes, Gibbon makes for interesting reading. Decline can indeed be prolonged. I suppose it's like how some things get very slowly better over the decades, other things get very slowly worse over the decades.
          • danielbln 2y ago
            Centuries, not decades.
            • Retric 2y ago
              I originally wrote centuries, but there’s reasonable criticism calling something a collapse when there’s periods of renewal and expansion in that timeframe.
• csomar 2y ago
  I think the closest and most recent example we have is the Soviet Union. The US has a more homogeneous culture and language though. However, I can see states "caring" about themselves more than the union. This might actually turn out good for some states though probably catastrophic for some others.
  • mpreda 2y ago
    Indeed, federations splitting apart -- that's what happens in tough times.
  • londons_explore 2y ago
    US schools really ram home the 'we are american' message. 'Land of the free' and all that. Those cultural ties will take tens, perhaps over 100 years, to weaken enough to cause a civil war.
    • ForTheKidz 2y ago
      I just don't think that's true at all. This country is ridiculously diverse and most people don't share much culture.
  • roenxi 2y ago
    The USSR was in a far worse position than the US is in. They had to build a wall to keep people from walking out. The US on the other hand is financially irresponsible. It can't afford a global Not-An-Empire any more because its economy is no longer the world's unchallenged largest but it isn't in a bad state in absolute terms. The scale of the challenges just aren't in the same league. Unless it decides to go down fighting and gets something important blown up it could easily remain a nice place to live for centuries. Nobody threatens the US, it is hard to see how it'll ever be in anyone's interest to threaten them, they can re-learn how to be an industrial powerhouse if they have to. Almost all its real problems are ill-advised domestic policies that can be changed pretty quickly if people decide the situation is hairy enough to be honest in politics. It might be in everyone's interests for the US to dissolve but it won't be as bad as the USSR dissolution was. It'd probably be a good outcome if they went back to the constitution as intended, depowered the federal government and became a collection of powerful states. A lot of the political tension is because whoever wins the fight over controlling the central government ends up with far too much power.
• BlarfMcFlarf 2y ago
  I think the collapse might take place in the shape of something like china: self interested elites, self sabotaging economic policy, a hollowing out economically by outside powers, numerous failed rebellions and devolution of central power due to lack of governability, etc. Aka, a period of somewhat rapid decay.
  • yodsanklai 2y ago
    Not an expert on China, but I thought standard of living for Chinese people greatly improved in past 1-2 decades? can we call that a collapse?
• bognition 2y ago
  The collapse is already happening it’s just happening slowly. We’ve offshored manufacturing, cut funding for education, have failed to invest in infrastructure.
  • derektank 2y ago
    We literally just invested $500B in infrastructure less than 4 years ago
  • nradov 2y ago
    US manufacturing output is higher than ever. Although it makes up a declining share of GDP since other sectors have grown faster. https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/USA/united-states/manufacturing-output https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/USA/uni... Education funding per pupil has steadily increased year after year. Maybe we should spend even more, but our problems with bad educational outcomes are mostly due to other factors rather than a lack of money. https://educationdata.org/public-education-spending-statistics https://educationdata.org/public-education-spending-statisti...
  • sethammons 2y ago
    Automation has done more to remove manufacturing jobs than offshore by a significant margin. 50-70% of job loss and wage reduction can be attributed to automation. https://www.axios.com/2021/06/17/automation-ai-income-inequality https://www.axios.com/2021/06/17/automation-ai-income-inequa... Even if we bring back all the manufacturing jobs we've lost, they represent fewer positions and automation will continue to be a downward force on wages.
    • bavell 2y ago
      Factories in the US are less automated than in many foreign countries (SK, China, Germany) [0]. Same with our ports. [0] https://ifr.org/ifr-press-releases/news/global-robot-density-in-factories-doubled-in-seven-years#:~:text=North%20America%C2%B4s%20robot,%2D%20an%20increase%20of%207.6%25. https://ifr.org/ifr-press-releases/news/global-robot-density...