6 ms·
> Now we are building a machine so we don't have to do heavy thinking ourselves. There are a lot of innovations that helped us not do heavy thinking ourselves.
by alonsonic 2y ago
> Now we are building a machine so we don't have to do heavy thinking ourselves.
There are a lot of innovations that helped us not do heavy thinking ourselves. Think calculators. We will just move to a higher level of magnitud problem to solve, software development is a means to an end, instead of thinking hard about coding we should be thinking hard about the problem being solved. That will be the future of the craft.
- Kye 2y agoCalculators are a good example of where letting too much knowledge slip can be an issue. So many are made by people with no grasp of order of operations or choosing data types. They could look it up, but they don't know they need to. It's one of those problems that seems easy, but isn't. The issue seems to come out when we let an aid for process replace gaining the knowledge behind the process. You at least need to know what you don't know so you can develop an intuition for when outputs don't (or might not) make sense. https://chadnauseam.com/coding/random/calculator-app https://chadnauseam.com/coding/random/calculator-app (recently: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43066953 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43066953)
- lupire 2y agoComplaining about "order of operations" is equivalent to saying Spanish speakers are ignorant because they don't know French. It's especially silly because one thing calculators are known for is being inconsistent about order of operations between designs.