19 ms·

No, and even if it were to happen car manufacturers can’t make 4+ year plans based on policies the next bonehead in chief might just revert. We need a mass pop

• genewitch 2y ago
  This isn't argumentative. Do you have anything i can look at to see why the EPA et al would not want a light, cheap, fuel efficient truck? is it capture by Ford and GM? Are there even trucks as small as the Nissans that had the 2400 motors (or 2600)? I live near enough texas that every truck is way too big, so i don't see many new, small trucks. A lot of people have the old, nearly all metal, small trucks.
  • go-nil-why 2y ago
    > i don't see many new, small trucks Right, because the EPA has made them illegal in favor of larger, less fuel efficient trucks. This paper covers the topic well^, you can also see many examples searching online for “EPA Small Truck Footprint”. ^ https://meche.engineering.cmu.edu/_files/images/research-groups/whitefoot-group/WS-FootprintFuelEconomy-EP.pdf https://meche.engineering.cmu.edu/_files/images/research-gro...
    • genewitch 2y ago
      Hey, thanks for replying! I read the title of that paper and immediately knew what it was going to prove. I have a recollection about this from 10 years ago, but for some reason it didn't comport with "it's the EPA's fault we can't have nice things" you'd think the https://www.nhtsa.gov/ https://www.nhtsa.gov/ would have something to say about regulations encouraging increased "box height" or grille height; which results in worse outcomes in nearly all accidents (could be all, but i don't feel comfortable asserting that.) sorry it took me five days to notice you replied.