8 ms·
Thankfully the episode's interpretation of a Good Samaritan Law is completely wrong, at least in many (most?) US states. They protect citizens acting in good fa
by redsaz 2y ago
Thankfully the episode's interpretation of a Good Samaritan Law is completely wrong, at least in many (most?) US states. They protect citizens acting in good faith to help somebody, not like it was interpreted in the episode to require somebody to help.
- epcoa 2y agoNot completely wrong. There are duty to rescue or duty to report laws, and they too are very commonly referred to as Good Samaritan laws even if that more commonly refers to a different concept of liability. https://www2.law.ucla.edu/Volokh/rescue.htm https://www2.law.ucla.edu/Volokh/rescue.htm Duty to report are on the books, including in Massachusetts (ch 268 §40), requiring bystanders to report crimes, but not necessarily render aid. Duty to report laws are rarely enforced, which is what makes the Seinfeld setup more ironic. Although MA has one of the broadest duty to report laws (covering armed robbery and manslaughter in addition to sexual assault), the max penalty is a $2500 fine, but other states have jail time penalties. Duty to rescue is most always only for special relationships, such as parent/guardian/child, spouse, employer/employee, passenger, not random bystanders. https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/law-and-life/in-which-states-do-i-have-a-duty-to-help/ https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/law-and-life/in-which-sta...