6 ms·
> a set of basic rights that aren't in conflict Do you have a reply to the arguments in these linked texts that property is inherently coercive? https://mattbr
by sprucevoid 2y ago
> a set of basic rights that aren't in conflict
Do you have a reply to the arguments in these linked texts that property is inherently coercive?
https://mattbruenig.com/2015/10/01/capitalism-is-coercive-and-creates-patterns-of-deprivation-as-explained-by-libertarian-blockquotes/ https://mattbruenig.com/2015/10/01/capitalism-is-coercive-an...
https://mattbruenig.com/2014/05/07/property-and-conflict/ https://mattbruenig.com/2014/05/07/property-and-conflict/
- pdonis 2y agoYes: the definition of "coercive" used in those texts is an example of what I described at the end of my post, the inability to imagine any concept of "liberty" that is not "do whatever I feel like"--or in this case, "grab whatever external resource I feel like".