6 ms·
The second paragraph is clearly sarcastic, but the rest seems genuine, so Im a bit confused.
by tifik 2y ago
The second paragraph is clearly sarcastic, but the rest seems genuine, so Im a bit confused.
- throwaway314155 2y agoThe second paragraph isn't sarcastic. At least not w.r.t. to Claude Code. That bit there about North Korean hackers is mild sarcasm, but has no bearing on the remainder of the post.
- jofzar 2y agoI was confused untill I watched a video of it in use, nope it wasn't that sarcastic. https://youtu.be/W13MloZg03Y https://youtu.be/W13MloZg03Y
- cpldcpu 2y agoThat guy leads in with stating that he is missing "autocomplete" in claude code. Cleary a misunderstanding of the scope.
- jofzar 2y agoI mostly posted the video because I thought it was a good demonstration of the prompts to approve/cost that the tweet was talking about. He talks about it later of using autocomplete vs complete writing, I don't think he misunderstood the scope just talking about the difference of ways ai can be used for coding assistant.