> social rights are nothing more than obligations on the rest of us I don’t agree here. It is not a zero sum game, everyone can win with social rights. I have

> social rights are nothing more than obligations on the rest of us I don’t agree here. It is not a zero sum game, everyone can win with social rights. I have read some Bertrand Russel, albeit many years ago now, and from what I remember he certainly did not argue against social rights, on the contrary. Do you have a reference to work by Bertrand Russel that argues for your point?