5 ms·
Wrong. He's angry because he didn't want to be acquired and didn't want to have his business shut down by Facebook turning off his access.
by caleywoods 14y ago
Wrong. He's angry because he didn't want to be acquired and didn't want to have his business shut down by Facebook turning off his access.
- natrius 14y agoNothing in the post suggests that Facebook threatened to turn off access.
- cbr 14y agoThey threatened this in a phone call, but he didn't record it so he didn't include it in the letter: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4325593 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4325593
- natep 14y agoNo, he didn't want to be acquired, and he didn't want to go to an aggressive acquisition negotiation meeting, since there would be no terms he would accept. He only went to the meeting because he thought it was a demo. Edit: actually, we're both right, according to the alleged contents of a phone call http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4325586 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4325586