6 ms·

You are wrong here. You can't have free markets without personal liberty. In the same way, personal liberties aren't a thing if are are unable to establish you

• tdb7893 2y ago
  I'm gonna ignore the first part because I've found on the internet people don't agree on what "free markets" mean. For the second part you don't need a business to be free. As a simple counterexample: I wouldn't say that human ancestors hunting and gathering in the savannah weren't free (they had literally no governmental limits) and it would take an absurd stretch to say they owned a business.
  • gcau 2y ago
    You're misunderstanding or strawmanning. You don't need a business to be free, obviously, and no not everyone that's free has a business (???). But that's different from being forbidden from making one.
    • djrobstep 2y ago
      The concept of a business can only exist within the context of a myriad of laws (property law, contract law, etc) all of which require violent enforcement or the threat thereof, ie reduction in personal liberty.
• djrobstep 2y ago
  > You can't have free markets without personal liberty I literally just explained why the exact opposite is true. Not a proactive conversation if you’re not going to engage at all with what I said and just talk past it.