7 ms·
I don't know, but I found the recording uninspiring. There was nothing new for me. We've all seen reasoning models by now—we know they work well for certain use
by shekhargulati 2y ago
I don't know, but I found the recording uninspiring. There was nothing new for me. We've all seen reasoning models by now—we know they work well for certain use cases. We've also seen "Deep Researchers," so nothing new there either.
No matter what people say, they're all just copying OpenAI. I'm not a huge fan of OpenAI, but I think they're still the ones showing what can be done. Yes, xAI might have taken less time because of their huge cluster, but it’s not inspiring to me. Also, the dark room setup was depressing.
- pixelsort 2y agoSeems like the opinion of someone who doesn't know that OpenAI cloned Anthropic's innovations of artifacts and computer use with their "canvas" and "operator".
- cromwellian 2y agoThose are applied-ML level advancements, OpenAI has pushed model level advancements. xAI has never really done much it seemed except download the latest papers and reproduce them.
- pixelsort 2y agoDon't forget that OpenAI was also following Anthropic's lead at the model level with o1. They may have been first with single-shot CoT and native tokens, but advancements from the product side matter, and OpenAI has not been as original there some would like to believe.
- swyx 2y agoand Gemini's Deep Research
- swyx 2y ago(forgot to plug their interview https://latent.space/p/gdr https://latent.space/p/gdr)
- talles 2y agoThis sounds like "this feature is so 2024".