8 ms·
I liked Grok 3 fiction writing style; catches lots of physics of mundane situations such as ringing echo in a closed bathroom we all know well; the prose feels
by iamnotagenius 2y ago
I liked Grok 3 fiction writing style; catches lots of physics of mundane situations such as ringing echo in a closed bathroom we all know well; the prose feels very lively as the result. Kinda like R1 makes situations sharp with details, Grok 3 makes the other way around - rounded by using details.
- dazzaji 2y agoThat sounds like very evocative prose. Would you be up for sharing some of that fiction? I haven’t tried Grok 3 for that purpose and now I’m curious.
- dazzaji 2y agoUpdate: Now I am a person who has used Grok 3 to generate evocative fiction (using your description as the catalyst): https://x.com/i/grok/share/r8XR6IdeuzDLDFTL7xDHLuADO https://x.com/i/grok/share/r8XR6IdeuzDLDFTL7xDHLuADO
- iamnotagenius 2y agoWell because you explicitly ask it to demonstrate the physics, it came out way too detailed, but point is that it adds details on its own to scenes, make more realistic, not that dry LLama 3.3 style.
- iamnotagenius 2y agoHere is the sentence : (She screamed, which echoed off the tile walls. “This is my life now,” she said to her reflection, which looked back at her with a mix of disgust and pity.) Looks good to me. try it on Lmarena.ai.