24 ms·
Right, so it's useful to just just say things without evidence, because they "might turn out to be true" in the future. Something being useful to Musk and his
by computerthings 2y ago
Right, so it's useful to just just say things without evidence, because they "might turn out to be true" in the future.
Something being useful to Musk and his goons doesn't make it "useful" without such qualifiers.
> The only reason you have to believe that Musk's statements are not correct is the aforementioned inaccurate assertion about COBOL.
Hardly. That's just saying how little attention you paid to the man.
- fastball 2y agoNot giving out evidence in a press conference (how does he even do that?) does not mean that his assertions were made without evidence.
- computerthings 2y agoSo where's the evidence?
- fastball 2y agoPresumably in the SS database. Is your idea that he should give everyone on the internet access to this database? Because other than seeing it for yourself, I'm not sure what evidence he can provide that you will believe.
- computerthings 2y agoMore than zero would be a start. You said it's not viable to give evidence of claims during a press conference, okay, but it's been a while since then.
- frugalmail 2y agoHis team ran a query and shared the results. How is that zero? What do you expect him to provide? Litterally NOBODY is arguing that the results aren't accurate based on data other than an, easily verifiable, erroneous claim about the COBOL platform or "mUsK SAiD iT"
- frugalmail 2y agoNo analyst or technical insiders have come out to dispute it, can't be that wrong.
- mistermann 2y ago[dead]
- frugalmail 2y ago>so it's useful to just just say things without evidence, because they "might turn out to be true" in the future. The evidence is a query run on the data. No insiders have disputed the results. >Hardly. That's just saying how little attention you paid to the man. Convincing evidence filled rebuttal from an internet rando. What @fastball said is based on readily available fact.