6 ms·
I think it would be enough to simply move the 3 point line back a couple feet AND have it follow its natural arc out of bounds, thus eliminating the shorter an
by pgm8705 2y ago
I think it would be enough to simply move the 3 point line back a couple feet AND have it follow its natural arc out of bounds, thus eliminating the shorter and easier corner 3 shot.
- bdangubic 2y agocouple of feet is not enough. the line needs to move far enough such that vast majority of the players (more than 95%) shoot less than 30% from there. so probably 8 to 10 feet back. absolutely should happen but they will likely do something awesome like shortening quarters to 10 minutes
- idlewords 2y agoJust fill the ball with water.
- pandemic_region 2y agoBut not fully otherwise it becomes easy again.
- mooreds 2y agoWhat about tying 2 sets of players (one pair on each team) feet together, potato sack relay style?
- bdangubic 2y agocurry and bol bol are two good candidates. in today’s nba you can’t tell difference between them on the court except for several feet of height difference. but practically same player as they shoot about the same shots
- kenjackson 2y agoI’d rather defenses covered it better to give up more 2s in the paint. If we make it too far out it no longer spaces the floor and then we’re back to a game in the paint.
- darkerside 2y agoThis is my preferred answer. Bring back physicality into the sport, especially on defense. There are moving screens on every play, and yet a defender can stand and get jumped into resulting in free throws.