5 ms·

> $6.3 million for men who have sex with men in South Africa Heh. But all in all: yes, and? You're just listing things as if listing them means there's a prob

• Dig1t 2y ago
  We did not vote to send our tax dollars to other countries for these things. People are outraged that their hard earned tax dollars are being wasted on stuff like this. I think you know that, there’s a reason these items are being downplayed or glossed over by corporate media. They know that if average people understood this waste they would be outraged. These are government employees. Government employees having read-only access to government systems is completely legal. You can keep throwing around the word “coup” as much as you want, the only thing it’s accomplishing is to make the word mean less. Just like calling everyone you disagree with “racist”. It’s not effective anymore, nobody cares.
  • computerthings 2y ago
    > We did not vote to send our tax dollars to other countries for these things. I have no reason to believe you know what "these things" are. > People are outraged that their hard earned tax dollars are being wasted on stuff like this. And they too don't know, and don't even ask, what "this" is. They see "men having sex with men" and it's off to the races apparently. > You can keep throwing around the word “coup” as much as you want, the only thing it’s accomplishing is to make the word mean less. With whom? The people who are going along so far are probably FUBAR anyway, not everything is for them.