9 ms·
Great, so we only want the real high risk takers, the top gamblers,to play in the big league. Those who are so rich they no way to lose their personal comfort a
by ilbeeper 2y ago
Great, so we only want the real high risk takers, the top gamblers,to play in the big league. Those who are so rich they no way to lose their personal comfort and are blind to the personal risk - and probably are careless about anyone's else just as well
- mech422 2y agoDon't we have that already? Bootstrapped startups with the founders money on the line typically don't play in the 'big league's till way after the founder is at risk..
- robertlagrant 2y ago> Great, so we only want the real high risk takers, the top gamblers,to play in the big league It either takes risk of private capital or future taxpayers' taxes to create big leagues. I'd take the former over the latter.
- ilbeeper 2y agoAnd I prefer cold committee who measure risk and are committed to some public values. You choose silicone valley, VCs and no public healthcare. I prefer the Norwegian model.
- robertlagrant 2y agoIt works great when the innovation happens elsewhere and is freely shared.