10 ms·
But who's "us", and who is "them"? Could it be a matter of perspective? Would it surprise you to discover that you're someone else's "them"?
by dazilcher 2y ago
But who's "us", and who is "them"?
Could it be a matter of perspective? Would it surprise you to discover that you're someone else's "them"?
- develatio 2y agoExactly. People usually think of “them” as the very wealthy, but they don’t even realize that earning just a little bit over $40.000/year makes you belong to the top 10% of the world measured by wealth. Earning $60.000/year takes you to the top 5%. Chances are that “you” (average reader of HN) belong to the “them” you critique so much. https://wid.world/income-comparator/ https://wid.world/income-comparator/
- qgin 2y agoI'd bet the majority people reading Hacker News are the "them" by most measures.
- was8309 2y agosorry for late comment, but the problem is clearer to me when considering it as resource control, rather than 'wealth'. Earning $60k gives you control of barely nothing. It would take 10's of millions of dollars just to have any effect on a small US city. It's a football field with 9995 people stuffed in an endzone and 5 people controlling the rest of the field.
- Newtonip 2y ago"Them" are the rich and we are the rest. Where do we draw the line? How about those of use who work to earn a living versus those who make money because they own a lot rather than because they work for it. Of course, this does not include those who have worked all their life and have retired to live off their accumulated funds.