6 ms·
Yep. That is exactly the idea here. Our compression method is super duper naive. We literally keep every n-th weight column and discard the rest. Turns out that
by mayukhdeb 2y ago
Yep. That is exactly the idea here. Our compression method is super duper naive. We literally keep every n-th weight column and discard the rest. Turns out that even after getting rid of 80% of the weight columns in this way, we were able to retain the same performance in a 125M GPT.