6 ms·
^ This is publicly new information, and the 2nd part especially contradicts consequential rumours that had been all-but-cemented in closely-following outsiders'
by gadtfly 2y ago
^ This is publicly new information, and the 2nd part especially contradicts consequential rumours that had been all-but-cemented in closely-following outsiders' understanding of Sonnet and Anthropic. Completely aside from anything else in this article.
- gadtfly 2y agoAlso, though it's not "new information": "Making AI that is smarter than almost all humans at almost all things [...] is most likely to happen in 2026-2027." continues to sail over everybody's head, not a single comment about it, even to shit on it. People will continue to act as though they are literally blind to this, as though they literally don't see it.
- suraci 2y agowe're getting used to it and, personally, i think, if any CEO in this industry dare to say "we won't get a super AI in 2028" many people will be disappointed, some people will be scared, and one prisident be pissed off
- disgruntledphd2 2y agoI find that really, really, really hard to believe, given the current approaches.
- dragonwriter 2y ago> People will continue to act as though they are literally blind to this, as though they literally don't see it. Or like they see it and have learned the appropriate weight to give unsupported predictions of this type from people with a vested interest in them being perceived as true. It not only not new information, its not information at all.