7 ms·
Wait timeout. I thought DeepSeek's stuff was all MIT licensed too no? What limitations are you thinking of that DeepSeek still has?
by seberino 2y ago
Wait timeout. I thought DeepSeek's stuff was all MIT licensed too no?
What limitations are you thinking of that DeepSeek still has?
- Palmik 2y agoI am referring to this one: https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3/blob/main/LICENSE-MODEL https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3/blob/main/LIC... It is a bit more permissive than Llama's it seems (no MAU threshold it seems).
- seberino 2y agoWow. Your link is frustrating because I thought everything was under the MIT license. Why did people claim it is MIT licensed if they sneaked in this additional license?
- orra 2y agoSo, the older DeepSeek-V3 model weights are sadly not permissively licensed. But the recent DeepSeek-R1-Zero and DeepSeek-R1 have MIT licensed weights.
- seberino 2y agoThank you very much. That was helpful. Do we need the older model weights to use the recent DeepSeek-R1-Zero and DeepSeek-R1 models?
- orra 2y agoI can't be 100% certain, but I think the good news is: no. There seem to be the exact same number of safetensor files for both, and AFAICT the file sizes are identical. https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3/tree/main https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3/tree/main https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1/tree/main https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1/tree/main