5 ms·
this plane doesn't look like it was made to produce a low boom. It has a very distinct von Karman ogive [1] fuselage and typical delta wings. I would guess that
by skgough 2y ago
this plane doesn't look like it was made to produce a low boom. It has a very distinct von Karman ogive [1] fuselage and typical delta wings. I would guess that it's shape is primarily optimized for fuel efficiency at 1.5 mach or above.
If you take a look at NASA's low boom demonstrator [2], you can see that it's much skinnier and the nose is crazy elongated. This is intended to break up the bow shock into multiple parts, thereby decreasing the amount of energy each one has.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nose_cone_design#Von_K%C3%A1rm%C3%A1n https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nose_cone_design#Von_K%C3%A1rm...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_X-59_Quesst https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_X-59_Quesst
- yownie 2y agoSilly question, but would it be feasible to just equip a plan with a telescoping nose merely for this effect that could be deployed prior to supersonic flight?
- Onavo 2y agoWeight would kill the economics. It's not a fighter jet. But maybe it will be fine for drones. You should apply to YC.