5 ms·
>President can reliably promise under current law, as opposed to needing Congressional involvement? I don't think so and your question was not addressed in the
by grajaganDev 2y ago
>President can reliably promise under current law, as opposed to needing Congressional involvement?
I don't think so and your question was not addressed in the article.
Seems like very biased and irresponsible reporting.
>Does it apply to people dismissed because the President demanded to know how they voted and didn't like the answer?
Good point - I would expect they get nothing.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- Terr_ 2y ago> I would expect they get nothing. A Not-Actually-Fun-Fact I learned today: Even the Nazis doing their early purge of the German government [0] still found it necessary to offer 3 months of severance and 3/4ths continued pension. [0] The 1933 legislation was against "officials whose previous political activities do not guarantee that they will always be fully committed to the national state."