9 ms·
On the contrary, ArXiv is for pre-prints, i.e. not (yet) peer-reviewed. Off the top of the my head, it was initially used by physicists who often have huge coll
by _l7dh 2y ago
On the contrary, ArXiv is for pre-prints, i.e. not (yet) peer-reviewed. Off the top of the my head, it was initially used by physicists who often have huge collaborations and long reviewing time. Then the ML community invaded the space later on. This does not mean a peer-reviewed paper cannot go there of course.
- gus_massa 2y agoMost of the times the peer review version has a copiright restriction, so the arxiv version is the finañ draft that may have small differences.