7 ms·

"was trained on <100 hours of audio" How the hell was it trained on that little data ?

• deleted 2y ago
  [deleted]
• Havoc 2y ago
  Yeah that surprised me as well - seems low vs what is used on text llms . To be fair 100 hours of speaking is a lot of speaking though
  • edude03 2y ago
    But it covers five? Languages so if all equal it’s just 20 hours per language.
    • em-bee 2y ago
      in the linked audio sample it says the training data is mostly english. also another comment claims that the japanese quality is not good, so i'd be suspicious about all the other languages.
• bbminner 2y ago
  I suppose it means per speaker. And it is based on a simplified style tts 2 which from my small dive into the subject seems one of the smaller models achieving great quality.