4 ms·

it’s to make sure your kids go to the best school possible, and are surrounded by as many future successful people as possible. considering schools are funded b

• s1artibartfast 2y ago
  Tax revenue is spread across all schools, at least in California. Poor schools actually get more government funding per student. This is why good school districts California usually have ties to non-governmental chairty parents associations that parents contribute directly. It is also a huge part of why California passed prop 13. After property taxes we're separated from funding local schools, homeowners were simply much less willing to pay for taxes that won't go to their kid or community.
  • pokerface_86 2y ago
    i doubt the adage is california specific, and likely came about before prop 13. as an outsider, i think cali’s schooling system is beyond fucked, mostly due to the focus on the bottom 25% of students. the middle and high achieving students are being neglected and leaving. positive feedback loop.
    • s1artibartfast 2y ago
      I frequently hear people, mostly online, arguing that we should eliminate opportunities for smart children as a means to close the performance gap.
      • gnkyfrg 2y ago
        Bush's no child left behind was catastrophic. Terrible strategy.