Hah, more license confusion! It is a good learning resource for those wanting to see how such a codebase works. I do think they should have opened the repositor

Hah, more license confusion! It is a good learning resource for those wanting to see how such a codebase works. I do think they should have opened the repository as read-only and that may align more with the educational intent. "We will only consider pull requests and issues regarding self-hosting or critical fixes. " Having this makes the messaging a bit confusing. You will accept improvements and bug fixes which we can use commercially but you can't - Did I read that right?