7 ms·
My guess, as someone who doesn’t know the answer but works closely in this field, is that the potential downside (i.e. privacy/security) was much greater than t
by csswizardry 2y ago
My guess, as someone who doesn’t know the answer but works closely in this field, is that the potential downside (i.e. privacy/security) was much greater than the actualised benefit (i.e. performance).
Safari (who make a big deal about being privacy-conscious) was the first to introduce cache partitioning, looking into it as far back as 2013[1]; Chrome followed in 2020 and Firefox in 2021[3]. One thing I know, anecdotally, to be a strong motivator among browser vendors is ‘X is doing it, why aren’t we?’
1. https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110269 https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110269
2. https://developer.chrome.com/blog/http-cache-partitioning https://developer.chrome.com/blog/http-cache-partitioning
3. https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2021/01/26/supercookie-protections/ https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2021/01/26/supercookie-pro...