66 ms·
Add some extra information, and it gets confused. This is 4o. https://chatgpt.com/share/67759723-f008-800e-b0f3-9c81e656d653 https://chatgpt.com/share/67759723
by anon946 2y ago
Add some extra information, and it gets confused. This is 4o.
https://chatgpt.com/share/67759723-f008-800e-b0f3-9c81e656d653 https://chatgpt.com/share/67759723-f008-800e-b0f3-9c81e656d6...
One might argue that it's impossible to compress air using known engineering, but that would be a different kind of answer.
- amluto 2y agoIt seems more like ChatGPT was asked a rather bizarre question with far too little detail to make sense, and ChatGPT failed to notice or to ask for more information. Although it did get rather impressively confused about the pressure of the air.
- F7F7F7 2y ago“Failed to notice” is a hilariously weird way of talking about tokenization.
- amluto 2y agoTokenization? I mean that ChatGPT had no questions about the container of the gas (does it have weight? is it tared out?) or about buoyancy. And it’s really rather sad that ChatGPT calculated the volume of air at atmospheric temperature and pressure and didn’t notice that it was nowhere near fitting into its supposed container. (At least 1.01lb of liquid nitrogen would fit.)
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]