5 ms·
Yes. "A communist state" is an oxymoron. Communism is by definition stateless. Government/governance, sure, but without a state. Rojava would probably be a bett
by unicornporn 2y ago
Yes. "A communist state" is an oxymoron. Communism is by definition stateless. Government/governance, sure, but without a state. Rojava would probably be a better example of communism (in practice) than Soviet.
- skirge 2y ago"state" is area where government is able to collect taxes and respected by other governments. Thus "communist state" is not oxymoron.
- unicornporn 2y agoI don't understand your point. > A communist society would entail the absence of private property and social classes, and ultimately money and the state (or nation state).[1] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism
- skirge 2y agoI was born in communist country. No money, only objective points to describe cost of production and egibility, no police but militia, one "united" workers party and tax in nature and goods. But no money ;D and no state ;D