5 ms·
Even with RAG you’re bounded at some 93%, it’s not a panacea.
by hatenberg 2y ago
Even with RAG you’re bounded at some 93%, it’s not a panacea.
- scarface_74 2y agoHow are you bounded? When you can easily check the sources? Also you act as if humans without LLMs have a higher success rate? There is an entire “reproducibility crisis” with research.
- hatenberg 2y agoFalse equivalence. Humans fail in predictable ways that can be mitigated though process and training. Try training an LLM.
- scarface_74 2y agoHow are the results any different? You can’t completely trust human output. There are all sorts of cognitive biases that come into play.