6 ms·
It's cute but on my AOC (at 120hz) the discoloration is substantial. Also any inconsistency in frame time will break the illusion
by zanfr 2y ago
It's cute but on my AOC (at 120hz) the discoloration is substantial. Also any inconsistency in frame time will break the illusion
- BlurBusters 2y ago- Turn off HDR, use Adobe sRGB both at OS level, display icc level, and display menu level. The math in the CRT simulator is optimized for the gamma2linear/linear2gamma math, needed for Talbot-Plateau Theorem, and it was easier on a well-known old gamma curve. - Adjust your black levels and white levels so there's no clipping - I noticed 6bit TN panels tend to have problems, try IPS or OLED - Lower GAIN_VS_BLUR to 0.5 at 120Hz, or 0.25 at 240Hz, if discoloration is bothersome. - There are some optimizations coming in January 2025 as band-aid workaround for display limitations (especially low-Hz TN LCDs), even 240Hz is sometimes too low. OLED at 240Hz looks better than LCD at 360Hz with the CRT simulator for example, so if you're buying a monitor to have 75%-90% motion blur reduction in your 60fps retro content, you will want to have a high-Hz OLED, see the motion blur physics at TestUFO Variable-Persistence Black Frame Insertion demo (in TestUFO 2.1) to understand how higher Hz can reduce motion blur of low frame rates more than lower Hz; it's just the laws of physics caused by ergonomic flickerless sample-and-hold displays, and BYOA (Bring Your Own Algorithm) approaches. I can emulate plasma subfields on a 600Hz OLED, and I can emulate DLP subfields on a 1440Hz OLED; but CRT is the gold standard; still it needs a large native:simulated Hz ratio to look realistic. It's very adjustable.
- monkeye 2y agoFantastic work! What will be the use case of plasma and DLP subfields emulation? What about 24fps movie contents, is there a future with fluidity and no visible stutter by chance?