4 ms·
This is a great point that nobody will shoot you over :) But the main question is still: assuming you replace an undergrad with a model, who checks the work?
by binarymax 2y ago
This is a great point that nobody will shoot you over :)
But the main question is still: assuming you replace an undergrad with a model, who checks the work? If you have a good process around that already, and find utility as an augmented system, then get you’ll get value - but I still think it’s better for the undergrad to still have the job and be at the wheel, and does things faster and better when leveraging a powerful tool.
- hyhconito 2y agoShot already for criticising the shiny thing (happened with crypto and blockchain already...) Well to be fair no one checks what the graduates do properly, even if we hired KPMG in. That is until we get sued. But at least we have someone to blame then. What we don't want is something for the graduate to blame. The buck stops at someone corporeal because that's what the customers want and the regulators require. That's the reality and it's not quite as shiny and happy as the tech industry loves to promote itself. My main point, probably cleared up with a simple point: no one gives a shit about this either way.