10 ms·
they’re still bad for generating any significant body of code. They’re a little bit better about deciphering errors. They’ll still bullshit* you and send you
by mithametacs 2y ago
they’re still bad for generating any significant body of code.
They’re a little bit better about deciphering errors.
They’ll still bullshit* you and send you on wild goose chases.
*hallucinate if you prefer
- matheusmoreira 2y ago> They’ll still bullshit you and send you on wild goose chases And confidently at that. It can't seem to find the backbone to say no to me either. If I say something like "wait, X doesn't seem to make sense, isn't it actually Y and Z?" it will agree and reformulate the answer as if Y and Z were correct just to placate me. I usually use the LLM to learn new things, I don't don't actually know if Y and Z apply.