6 ms·

> if the underlying LLMs dont get any better, there is no reason to expect the system built out of them to get any better. Actually o1, o3 are doing exactly th

> if the underlying LLMs dont get any better, there is no reason to expect the system built out of them to get any better. Actually o1, o3 are doing exactly this, and very well. I.e. explicitly: by proper orchestration the same LLM can do much better job. There is a price, but... > you would expect to be able to build agentic systems out of much smaller LLMs Good point, it should be possible to do it on a high-end pc or even embedded.

wokwokwok 2y ago
> but that overwhelmingly doesn’t work. MCTS will be the next big “thing”; not agents.
- bubaumba 2y ago
  They are not mutually exclusive. Likely we'll get more clear separation of architecture and underlying technology. In this case agents (i.e. architecture) can use different technologies or mix of them. Including 'AI' and algorithms. The trick is to make them work together.