5 ms·

"Source First License 1.1" is an interesting choice. Sounds like something specific to this developer (so far, at least). I'm not savvy enough to be sure, but i

"Source First License 1.1" is an interesting choice. Sounds like something specific to this developer (so far, at least). I'm not savvy enough to be sure, but it doesn't sound compatible with any of the commonly accepted-as-FOSS licenses. https://github.com/futo-org/Grayjay.Desktop/blob/373cd8448cb0ede78a0a1f8a0cf25ca7666f56d4/LICENSE.md https://github.com/futo-org/Grayjay.Desktop/blob/373cd8448cb...

deleted 2y ago
[deleted]
bramhaag 2y ago
> it doesn't sound compatible with any of the commonly accepted-as-FOSS licenses. Correct, it violates the four essential freedoms by placing restrictions on commercial use amongst other things.
akimbostrawman 2y ago
It's closer to source available than proprietary