> Unlike tokenization, BLT has no fixed vocabulary for patches. iiuc this means: the vocabulary of patches is not known prior to training. I guess once traini

> Unlike tokenization, BLT has no fixed vocabulary for patches. iiuc this means: the vocabulary of patches is not known prior to training. I guess once training has established a vocabulary of patches, that same fixed vocabulary is used for inference (if this is not true I don't see how it could work). Right?