7 ms·
The data would still be awful, and people would pay less attention to the study because it’s not a priori surprising that ChatGPT would write worse poetry than
by Hercuros 2y ago
The data would still be awful, and people would pay less attention to the study because it’s not a priori surprising that ChatGPT would write worse poetry than the most celebrated poets in history.
If I use bad data to conclude that “Java is faster than C++ in most cases” you can be sure it will receive a lot more attention than if I reached the opposite conclusion based on similarly bad data.
- ykonstant 2y ago> The data would still be awful, and people would pay less attention to the study because it’s not a priori surprising that ChatGPT would write worse poetry than the most celebrated poets in history. [emphasis mine] You've inadvertently made the poster's point for them. You have written Spivak's "I knew it" reaction, just phrased more glibly.