7 ms·
+1 for vanilla code without LangChain.
by krawczstef 2y ago
+1 for vanilla code without LangChain.
- chompychop 2y agoHuh? All of their notebooks use LangChain.
- hbamoria 2y agoI believe you're looking for notebooks w/o Langchain. We plan to publish them in next few days :)
- imworkingrn 2y agowhats wrong with langchain ?
- ErikBjare 2y agoI haven't used it in a year, but my experience was it frequently broke in all sorts of ways. I have since avoided it like the plague.
- imworkingrn 2y agoI hear you. Had the same experience. It's matured a lot since then though. Got back to it a few weeks ago and it feels surprisingly stable.
- prsdm 2y agoit's much more stable now.
- sauwan 2y agoDoes it still put you in dependency hell though, where you can't add new packages without causing tons of version conflicts?
- efriis 2y agoHowdy! Erick from LangChain here. If anyone is seeing version conflicts on particular packages, please let me know! These usually stem from overly strict constraints in the underlying sdks for the integrations, and in general we've been pretty successful asking for those constraints to be loosened. The main "problem" constraint we've seen in the past has been on httpx. Curious if you've seen others!
- chompychop 2y agoDoes it still have the "abstraction hell" issue when trying to work with it for custom, non out-of-the-box use cases?