6 ms·
Because it's physically not the same. Again, 1 fixed camera does not provide as much data as a single eye. It's not about the resolution, it's about the 3d pe
by olabyne 2y ago
Because it's physically not the same.
Again, 1 fixed camera does not provide as much data as a single eye. It's not about the resolution, it's about the 3d perception that even a single eye provides.
You can try yourself : close one eye, and you still have a good 3d perception. Now try to make your orbit fixed, no head or eye movement, and then everything feels flatter.
- ArtTimeInvestor 2y agoMetal wings are also not physically the same as two feet. Yet, planes can move faster than humans. How well cars will be able to maneuver with cameras and superhuman intelligence specialized in this task is yet to be seen. Maybe we could try to find dashcam videos of self-driving cars causing accidents. Then one could form an opinion if the camera footage will be enough for future versions of the software to correctly assess what is on it. Here is one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jcj-1hNwPiw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jcj-1hNwPiw The crash is at 1:08 To me, it seems entirely possible to understand the situation from the camera footage alone.