5 ms·
Visual part is nice and Landing page and slick. However, I am not trolling but what happens when NextJS is no longer the hot commodity that it is today. I would
by codegeek 2y ago
Visual part is nice and Landing page and slick. However, I am not trolling but what happens when NextJS is no longer the hot commodity that it is today. I would prefer a Visual CMS that lets me do all this but the output should always be static HTML/CSS/JS. Most tools either do the visual part well but fail at the output or vice versa. I don't mind if the stack is NextJS or whatever but the final output should be a static HTML. Bonus if you can push to deploy to Netlify/Cloudflare Pages/S3 etc
- darepublic 2y agoI see more of a reason for nextjs than tailwind personally. Having perhaps different export formats would be good but I do feel like nextjs is a decent standard, for now at least.
- Centigonal 2y agoalways pushing to static HTML limits you to minimal backend interactivity
- bilekas 2y agoI'm not sure this is exactly true these days with htmx I've been having a rush of fun again with light weight front ends. And full two way binding support.
- dncornholio 2y agoThe exported code will always work, it doesn't depend on any popularity?
- paradite 2y agoI think you are looking for FrontPage or Dreamweaver?
- dangsux 2y ago[dead]
- __oh_es 2y agohttps://pinegrow.com https://pinegrow.com may serve your needs well here epic product