4 ms·
And in case they choose "no", that carbon tax for farm animals help to think second time.
by batushka5 2y ago
And in case they choose "no", that carbon tax for farm animals help to think second time.
- aziaziazi 2y agoIn case they farm carbon intensive animals like cows, yes. For the pigs farmers no so much. However those pigs farms totally destroy Denmark fishing areas which traditionally feed the population.
- flanked-evergl 2y agoYeah, it's much better for farming to be moved to countries with less labour and environmental regulations.
- contagiousflow 2y agoThat concern has already been discussed https://www.regeringen.dk/media/13261/aftale-om-et-groent-danmark.pdf https://www.regeringen.dk/media/13261/aftale-om-et-groent-da...
- flanked-evergl 2y agoThe Uyghurs slaves making your iPhone are grateful that you discussed how much better off the world is. Some serious "but who will pick the cotton vibes".
- contagiousflow 2y agoI think you're replying to the wrong comment? The article linked talks about how less area is needed for farming due to higher crop yields
- danlugo92 2y agoThey are further off shoring the economy now using the excuse of climate change. As if farmers in Cambodia aren't draining his tractor's oil into the river passing through their land. Bonus points the politicians can then import the food using a shell company in Singapore and steal tax dollars.