5 ms·
Sure, but none of these are true alternatives because they are missing a lot of features that libraries like GLFW or RGFW have. (They may be good alternatives
by colleagueRiley 2y ago
Sure, but none of these are true alternatives because they are missing a lot of features that libraries like GLFW or RGFW have.
(They may be good alternatives for certain use-cases)
- Sharlin 2y agoOh, just based on the README I assumed RGFW was more minimal than it actually is.
- colleagueRiley 2y agoMinimal refers to the code itself. GLFW's codebase is ~10MB while RGFW's is about ~300kb. But RGFW tries to support nearly everything that GLFW supports.
- Sharlin 2y agoYeah, my bad :)