Turning CO2 into a stable feed-stock seems to be an important part of it, given that as the article says, we need to be processing gigatons per year. If we’re

Turning CO2 into a stable feed-stock seems to be an important part of it, given that as the article says, we need to be processing gigatons per year. If we’re just using our captured CO2 to extract more fossil fuels to burn, thats not nearly as big a reduction in atmospheric CO2.